Aiden Paulson
Website Comparison
Website 1:
https://bruno-simon.com/#
Website 2:
https://www.squadeasy.com/en/
1. Navigation
When you drive around in this website, there are signs that tell you where things are so you can drive and look at the content (good). Even though its not the traditional navigation bar (bad), navigating a car captures the audiences attention and makes them want to stay on the website.
1. Navigation
The Navigation for this website is good and it has the standard navigation bar (good) which does not captivate the audience as well as the other website (bad).
2. Content
The content on Bruno Simon is pretty clear (good). You can easily drive around and read what the website has to say. The fact that you have to drive to see content is the only bad part because driving distracts users from actually reading the content (bad).
2. Content
Squad Easy's content is very clear and when you scroll, different visual design pops up like the phone (good). There are a lot of images spread around the screen that are of people which is irrelevant to the purpose of the website (bad).
3. Colours
In Bruno Simon the colour is mostly orange which is not the best colour and other colours could be used to contrast with the website (bad). It could be a lot better and easily improved if the colours were changed to a less vibrant colour. (good).
3. Colours
I don't really like the background colour of Squad Easy because it is just brown (bad) but the colour of the text is good and easy to read (good).
4. Text
The text of Bruno Simon is very easy to read and it is not too big or small (good). The text is all black which contrasts with the orange background which makes it easy on the eyes (good).
The text is hard to read while the car is moving (bad).
5. Clarity
Bruno Simons purpose is very clear (good) and I immediately know that it is a portfolio about Bruno Simon when i read the content. If its a portfolio website there should be contact information (bad)
4. Text
The text in Squad Easy is very big and takes up a lot of space (bad). The text could be a bit smaller but even though it is really big, it definitely captures the audience and makes people want to read it (good).
5. Clarity
Because of the overly large text in this website (bad) and how it is concise, I only have to read a few words to understand that it is a website about an app for team building (good).
6. Contact
The contact information is not easy to find on this website, in fact, I can't find it so i think the contact information should be put near where you start in the website so that you don't have to go find it (bad). For the purpose of this website I would think contact information would be left on here. Contact information is really easy to put on this website and can easily be updated (good).
6. Contact
It is not hard to contact anyone on this website because they have a contact page where you can put in your contact information and send a message to them and they will probably email you back (good). There isn't a clear contact information even though it is easy to get in contact with them (bad).
Conclusion
In conclusion I think the Squad Easy website is a bit better because it is clearer, more concise, and everything is easy to find. It is very clear and it is easy to get in contact with them. The only think i dislike about this website is the background colour because it is brown. If the background colour was more beige it would be a lot better.